Skip to content
exExperimentos
New: A benchmark harness that keeps dry runs out of the results

Local AI experiments,
with the receipts.

Practical experiments in local AI: quantization, speech, images, coding agents and the findings that changed what I run. Every result keeps its workload, source and limits.

⚡ RTX 3090 · 7⚡ Apple M5 · 3⚡ RTX 3060 · 3⚡ iPhone 15 Pro · 1
experiments
69
supporting notebooks
86
reviewed figures
56
research areas
7

Latest from the lab

Recent experiments

View all →
Devices & toolsField notes

A benchmark harness that keeps dry runs out of the results

The new harness layer provides four kinds of runs: streamed API throughput, GGUF quant comparison, task evaluation through lm-eval, and command-level memory/load measurement. It uses standard-library Python for the core, with optional external model and…

The archive now includes standard-library harnesses for throughput, quant comparison, task evaluation and VRAM measurement.

17 Oct 20260 data · 0 scripts
Speech & codecsResults

MOSS on a 3090: Q2 failed, AWQ4 stayed closer

Every profile began with the pinned BF16 generator. The comparison reused fixed reference codes and an FP32 decoder for the main quality measurements, keeping codec changes separate from generator quantization.

AWQ4 stayed close to the BF16 reference on WavLM and character errors; the sensitivity Q2 candidate was rejected.

17 Oct 20261 data · 0 scripts
Speech & codecsResults

Drama3: BF16 decoded the same codes about three times faster

The experiment replayed saved Spanish and English codes representing 21.5481 and 15.8824 seconds of audio. It compared FP32, BF16, mixed BF16 and two INT8 decoder variants on one RTX 3090.

BF16 reduced median decoder time from 390.07 to 129.54 ms in Spanish and from 292.42 to 96.88 ms in English.

RTX 3090
16 Oct 20262 data · 0 scripts
Speech & codecsResults

Keeping FP32 and moving Supertonic to Triton

Rather than reduce the CPU graph precision again, this follow-up used NVIDIA Triton’s ONNX backend with CUDA execution and the unchanged FP32 graphs. The paired comparison retained both speed and acoustic checks.

The paired GPU test cut median first-audio time to about 0.35 seconds while preserving the measured ASR results.

13 Oct 20261 data · 0 scripts
Speech & codecsResults

Longer Spanish phrases exposed the voice-transfer cost

Six phrases per language were synthesized with the production Supertonic stack, converted, then scored with an independent Parakeet recognizer. The experiment used public demo narrator references and did not alter the production application.

Speaker resemblance improved on longer phrases, but Spanish word error increased and conversion added over a second.

13 Oct 20261 data · 0 scripts
Speech & codecsResults

More diffusion steps did not reliably improve the voice match

The complete indexed collection contained fifty-one converted variants. Each was independently embedded against its exact selected narrator and source waveform. Twenty-nine used four steps, eleven eight and eleven twelve.

Matched six-sentence similarity intervals crossed zero for both eight-minus-four and twelve-minus-four steps.

13 Oct 20261 data · 0 scripts

Benchmarks with receipts

Every bar is a row in a file you can open.

Charts use the reviewed aggregate measurements, with their source revision, units and limits attached. Missing results stay unmeasured.

  • Methods stay attached. Each report explains the workload, hardware and what remains untested.
  • Measured trade-offs. Speed, memory and quality are reported separately; costs are included only when supported.
  • Data you can inspect. Download aggregate CSV, JSON, SVG and PNG exports. Private source material stays private.
Open the benchmark explorer

From A coding agent that knows when to ask for help

Recorded result

What recovery cost in three live scenarios

Single RTX 3090 · local Qwen worker + GLM reviewer · each scenario finished 10/10 checks

What recovery cost in three live scenariosRepeated failures · 2 reviews: 150 seconds; Acceptance failure · 1 review: 142 seconds; Successful task · no review: 9 seconds. Deliberately triggered integration scenarios; duration does not measure general coding accuracy.Repeated failures · 2 reviews150Repeated failures · 2 reviews: 150 secondsAcceptance failure · 1 review142Acceptance failure · 1 review: 142 secondsSuccessful task · no review9Successful task · no review: 9 seconds0seconds
  1. Repeated failures · 2 reviews150
  2. Acceptance failure · 1 review142
  3. Successful task · no review9

seconds

Deliberately triggered integration scenarios; duration does not measure general coding accuracy.

View data & source
What recovery cost in three live scenarios · seconds
ConfigurationValue
Repeated failures · 2 reviews150
Acceptance failure · 1 review142
Successful task · no review9

Origin: structured measurements. Revision 6550ead3945b.

Download measurement metadata (JSON)

Lab Notes

Write-ups and deep dives

All posts →

Free Lab Notes

Follow the next experiment

Get new findings in your feed reader. All published articles and measurement exports are free to read.

Follow via RSS

Follow the evidence

A notebook you can inspect

Read the methods, review the caveats, and explore the supporting notebooks behind the findings.

Explore the archive