Skip to content
exExperimentos
Speech & codecsResults13 Oct 2026

Longer Spanish phrases exposed the voice-transfer cost

Six phrases per language were synthesized with the production Supertonic stack, converted, then scored with an independent Parakeet recognizer. The experiment used public demo narrator references and did not alter the production application.

Key finding

Speaker resemblance improved on longer phrases, but Spanish word error increased and conversion added over a second.

Edited finding from the pinned experiment record. The report and figure metadata preserve the original workload and limits.

The boundary

Six utterances per language, 57 English and 56 Spanish reference words. Independent ASR is a proxy, not a human intelligibility panel.

Data

Reviewed aggregate results with explicit units, sources and qualification limits. Different cohorts remain separate.

Recorded result

The longer Spanish set exposed word errors

Six Spanish utterances · 56 reference words · timbre-only transfer

The longer Spanish set exposed word errorsOriginal Supertonic: 5.36 ASR word error (%); Voice transfer · 4 steps: 10.71 ASR word error (%); Voice transfer · 8 steps: 8.93 ASR word error (%); Voice transfer · 12 steps: 7.14 ASR word error (%). ASR proxy, not human listening. Six phrases are too few for a general language-quality claim.Original Supertonic5.36Original Supertonic: 5.36 ASR word error (%)Voice transfer · 4 steps10.71Voice transfer · 4 steps: 10.71 ASR word error (%)Voice transfer · 8 steps8.93Voice transfer · 8 steps: 8.93 ASR word error (%)Voice transfer · 12 steps7.14Voice transfer · 12 steps: 7.14 ASR word error (%)0ASR word error (%)
  1. Original Supertonic5.36
  2. Voice transfer · 4 steps10.71
  3. Voice transfer · 8 steps8.93
  4. Voice transfer · 12 steps7.14

ASR word error (%)

ASR proxy, not human listening. Six phrases are too few for a general language-quality claim.

View data & source
The longer Spanish set exposed word errors · ASR word error (%)
ConfigurationValue
Original Supertonic5.36
Voice transfer · 4 steps10.71
Voice transfer · 8 steps8.93
Voice transfer · 12 steps7.14

Origin: reviewed report table. Revision 7e6fdbe3b1d1.

Download measurement metadata (JSON)

Write-ups

Report tts/seed-vc2-voice-transfer-2026-10-13/extended-cross-language/README.md

Expand beyond the greeting

Six phrases per language were synthesized with the production Supertonic stack, converted, then scored with an independent Parakeet recognizer. The experiment used public demo narrator references and did not alter the production application.

The result that the greeting missed

English stayed at zero observed WER after four-step conversion. Spanish changed from 5.36% before conversion to 10.71% at four steps, 8.93% at eight and 7.14% at twelve. Some accent and proper-name differences already existed in the unconverted recognizer output.

Spanish median conversion time rose from 1.263 to 2.214 to 3.241 seconds. More steps reduced observed word errors slightly, at a substantial latency cost.

Cross-language transfer also completed six requests in each direction. Spanish speech using an English narrator reference reached cosine 0.813 and WER 10.71%; English using a Spanish reference reached 0.823 and zero observed WER.

What is ready

This establishes limited zero-shot transfer, not an exact voice clone or a seamless call. Keep Spanish conversion optional and experimental while testing content preservation, caching, streaming and actual two-device latency.

Evidence and publication boundary

This is an edited account of the recorded experiment. The linked archive is private; the methods, aggregate findings and limits are included above. Reference recordings, raw conversations, authentication material and workstation configuration are excluded.

More in Speech & codecs